I see pictures of Chloe Sevigny on many blogs and for the life of me, regardless of hairstyle, outfit or angle I DO NOT find her attractive. I am no great beauty myself but she is the physically ugliest girl to have anyone want take her picture in the whole history of celebrity culture. Hell I would choose Bea Arther over her.
If I was a paparazzi I would just save my film for the next starlet to enter the Oscars and they don't even USE film anymore. Please don't tell me she is a good actress and beauty doesn't count because we all know it does in that environment.
I always think she made some deal with the Devil to have the life she does - ESPECIALLY when I see her in more pictures than Scarlet, Brittany and Myley combined.
Maybe just one of her photos goes a LOOOONG way. "SNAP" - "Okay, Cloe. We don't need more than the one. That's it. We're done."
http://samuraifrog.tumblr.com/
%20(002).jpg)
%20(1)%20SDTB.jpg)
9 comments:
I feel the same way about Emily Blunt.
I agree. Nice legs, but that's not enough.
she usually dresses nice.
Is she an actress? I've seen her pictures but don't know what she does.
She's not beautiful. She's photogenic.
Just pretend she doesn't exist and don't look at it.
Drake, she is on that polygamy show 'Big Love' as the third prettiest wife of three.
Hell, man. Maybe it's because she looks kinda like my cousin, but I agree 100% with you: nothin' to see here, folks!
I think it's more a matter of her doing sexually explicit scenes etc. It makes her a sex symbol, but a cheap one.
I think they made a Chloe Sevigny joke on one of the few Cleveland Show episodes I've seen. I think it was the only time I'd heard of her outside Tumblr.
I did find out yesterday that Ms. Sevigny shares a birthday with me. That doesn't make her cool, though.
I think Emily Blunt is pretty, but again, I know nothing about her. Well, aside from that she's marrying John Kracinski, but I really think he should marry my friend sarah instead. {g}
Post a Comment