What the hell? You got your stupid giant ark movie with Russell Crowe. What more do you want?
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/03/06/russell-crowe-film-noah-edited-appease-christians-upset-by-historical-inaccuracies/#.Ux8EHEJt7kZ.facebook
Actually the flood effects do look very cool. I will watch it but only so I can mock it later. Mock it like Ricky Gervais did several years ago.
Tuesday, March 11, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
%20(002).jpg)
6 comments:
Don't think Emma Watson pulled this off. Antway, God sure makes Sauron look second tier.
Im going to see it. I heard the main complaints are that it refers to evolution and makes no mention of Adam, which is odd since Noah was about ten years old when Adam died, and Anthony Hopkins I believe plays Enoch, who also met with Adam when Adam called his posterity together and Christ appeared among them.
How do you make a religious film and inject evolution and deny Adam?
Is it a 'religious' film just because of it's source? It will never make you literalists happy.
Personally I'm looking forward to it - looks like a great fantasy film full of monsters and magic.
Eh. I'll pass.
But I do like the Ricky Gervais one. "God is not gay."
You can make a "religious" film that does those things if your definition of "religious" isn't "takes the Bible literally".
Post a Comment