Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Monsters


This movie begins with some grainy night vision footage showing a patrol of American soldiers fighting a huge tentacled creature that is perched on the top of a large building.

Of course that peeked my interest. Tentacles always mean bad things happen to good humans.

The daughter of a magazine publisher was injured in the attack and a reluctant photo journalist is recruited by her father to bring her out of Mexico and back to safety.


They couple are under time pressures on top of the dangers they face from the unpredictable aliens. They have to reach the coast in 48 hours if they have hope to be evacuated from Mexico. It seems the creatures are migrating south and soon all water routes out of the country will be blocked.

It seems that half of America is deemed an 'infested zone' after a deep space probe returned to earth with these alien creatures aboard. Since the aliens arrived, it has been a struggle for the militaries of both America and Mexico to contain the monsters.

The populations of both countries have lived under the treat of these monsters for the past six years. There are even cartoons on TV to show children how to put on gas masks to protect themselves in the event that fighter planes have to drop gas bombs toxic to the aliens.


It's amazing how the lives of the people just go on as usual in these circumstances. They don't have the means to escape to someplace else so they live on the hope that the creatures will not chose to attack their cities. What else can they do? It's been years since the aliens first arrived and the military has yet to destroy them all.

The photo journalist and the girl argue about his job along the way. She sees him as someone who is trying to profit from the misery the creatures cause. He thinks she is naieve about the way the world really works. It's the start of an attraction between the two.

When they get to the ocean they find that it will cost $5000 for her to take a ferry to America. The only other way to go is to take your chances in the 'infected zones' which is basically Northern Mexico and the American Southwest. Circumstances lead this couple to embark on the more dangerous route against their better judgement.


We get a strong sense of the way things are in this brave new world. The pressures have made some people more generous and others more corrupt as they all live under the threat of alien invasion. Handheld cameras are often employed to show the frenetic movements of these two through the crowded city streets and the dense jungle. Tension is created by what we DON'T see than by what we DO see and that was a smart decision for the director and screenwriter to make. The worst horror is always what we imagine in our minds.

This has all the markings of an independent film and a tight budget is why we don't get to see the creatures. Glimpses of the aliens are shown on grainy tape on the TV news but the movie seems to be more concerned with the photographer and the girl than with showing them fight any monsters. The film is more of a character study. On that level it does succeed.

It originally felt like a rip-off to call the movie 'Monsters' and have it turn into some 'boy meets girl' road film. Once I got over the fact that there weren't going to be to many actual monsters, I still found things to like about this film. The title is the biggest thing the movie has working against it.

In my reading I learned that many people were touting this as the new 'District 9'. The film was made on a very low budget, maybe as low as 15,000 dollars. This is from the official synopsis.


"The breakout hit of this years SXSW, Gareth Edwards’ groundbreaking new film is as much a poignant contemporary romance as it is an epic science fiction adventure. Shot with just a five person crew and a cast of two, Gareth Edwards’ team traveled through Guatemala, Belize and Mexico, finding and utilizing their locations and supporting actors as they went. The result is a film as cutting edge as it is classically composed, as emotionally satisfying as it is visually stunning, and the bold announcement of a major new talent.".

Pretty remarkable once you see the finished product. Just don't be expecting 'Independence Day'.

5 comments:

Rod Barnett said...

Hey! For some of us the phrase 'Don't expect INDEPENDENCE DAY' is a signal it might actually be a good movie. ID was a piece of shit. I remember apologizing to my date and vowing Emmerich would never get my money again.

Kal said...

I made that same promise after '2012'.

I am glad that this movie would appeal to you. It's pretty cool especially when you know how little it was made for. I just don't want people to hate the movie because of the title and the expectations that it should be non-stop shots of monsters attacking the army.

And answer me this. Why, when they see that their weapons are useless against the monster do they keep using their guns? I see this in every monster movie out there. That didn't work ten mintues ago, goober, why do you think it will be effective THIS time? GAH! I hate that. That is just Michael Bay level laziness. I promise that this film will stay with you longer than both 'Transformer' movies did combined.

This movie is actually pretty deep in it's message and more realistic. It is cliche to say this but it was a quietly beautiful science fiction story. I compare it to 'District 9' mixed with 'The Quiet Earth' in my mind...only with less aliens. I would be interested in your thoughts on this film when you see it...and you should.

Mike D. said...

I attended the Monsters panel at the 2010 NYC Comic Con (oh shit, I just realized that I never posted that...oops) with Gareth Edwards. While they say the movie was made for 15,000, Edwards said that was the cost of the equiptment (1 camera, boom mic, and computer) that was used at Best Buy. He did the effects himself, and didnt charge himself. But he said lots of money was spent on travel, marketing, and actors fees for the two leads (everybody else was volunteered). He still said it will probably come in under 2 million, which is so low for what it looks like he did. Checl CCD Tomorrow and I'll post the panel videos.

mercurius said...

Actually, the opening attack is a continuation of what happens when the soldiers come to rescue them at the end of the movie. I had to freeze-frame the video to catch it myself, but you can see Andrew dragging an injured Samantha away from the carnage while screaming for help.

Kal said...

Holy Crap Yang, I think you are right. Okay, that is freaking me out right now. So there was no happy ending. Of course that is what happened. The soldier humming that song at the end before the crash at the beginning. Trippy.