Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Black Death
I am a fan of any movie that involves a group of people going on a mission. We know that the unknown that they walk into will be full of danger and not everyone will make it out alive. However, there will always be one person who lives to tell the tale.
This time the quest takes place in Europe during the time of the Black Death which claimed nearly a third of Europe's population.
The late 1300s were not a fun time to be alive. Aside from the general lack of sanitation, the illiteracy, the bad food and the absence of anything resembling television, they had the Black Death or bubonic plague to worry about.
The disease attacked without warning and often whole villages were decimated by the sickness that was carried by mites and fleas on rats. It spread rapidly and presented itself as boils on the neck and under the arms.
This was also a time of great paranoia where it seemed that even God was unable to stop the deaths. It's not totally beyond understanding that some would following anyone, even the Devil, if it meant a chance for life. Many who were believed to be witches or in league with evil were routinely burned at the stake because of superstition.
Animals such as cats were seen as familiars to these witches and were killed in great numbers. Unfortunately this had the effect of increasing the rat population (and rats like to live around humans because we make it easy for them to thrive) and thus the number of plague victims.
This is how our tale begins. A knight called Ulric (Sean Bean) on an errand for a Bishop has come to a monastery looking for a guide to lead him and his men to a village that is rumored to be unaffected by plague. Bean is always good in these period pieces. He is part Richard Sharpe and part Boromir and it is his character's faith that anchors this tale.
There has been talk that these villagers have forsaken God in favor of a demon or a necromancer (one who can raise the dead). Whispers of cannibalism and human sacrifice have reached the ears of those beyond the village. What else can good god-fearing church men like the Bishop do but send a group of soldiers to investigate this claim?
A young monk volunteers to lead these soldiers to the village they seek. He is our naive eyes and ears to understanding the world outside his sheltered monastery.
Along with their swords, the soldiers also bring with them torture devices in case the villagers are not too keen on divulging their secrets willingly. It was very common for people to be tortured and burned at the stake if they were suspected of doing evil and could be accused on the slightest of evidence. Even your words could damn you.
I found this to be a really interesting tale of faith and how powerful a motivating force it can be. These men witness and participate in some pretty horrendous events but they can justify it through their belief in a higher being. They would rather die horrible deaths than renounce their beliefs.
As Ulric says when he is challenged by the monk for killing a woman believed to be a witch, "Killing witches IS God's work." Ulric believes he spared that woman's suffering that would have come from being burned alive. I can't argue with his mercy.
The film makes terrific use of the landscape and scenery. The pale of death hangs over everything and the director gets full use out of the setting. I was reminded of the novel 'Heart of Darkness' where things get worse the further and further the main characters travel into the dead land.
There is genuine mystery here too. What exactly IS going on in this village? How have they been able to avoid the Black Death that is claiming lives in villages all around them? It is a strange oasis of calm in an otherwise sick and dying land.
If I was one of the mercenaries and I had to evaluate all that I had experienced, I might reach the same mistaken opinions as they do.
The movie is visceral and violent. The fight scenes are realistically brutal. As I said at the beginning, not everyone is going to come out of this alive.
This is a different tale of the middle ages than I had ever seen before. It's very progressive in it's thinking but does a good job presenting it's message.
What is more dangerous - faith in God or not believing that anything like heaven or hell even exists? I don't know the answer to that question but I know that evil lurks in the heart of all men and how they justify it's expression is immaterial. Neither side comes out of this movie as a good example to be followed. I appreciated the ambiguity I was left with and that is a rare thing to take from any movie.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
14 comments:
I haven't seen the movie, but your final paragraph disturbs me a bit. You seem to simply equate Faith in God with being good and not believing in a heaven or hell being bad.
Non-believers have morals, just as anyone does. We just don't believe we need to be told what our morals should be, based on whatever book of instruction that gets passed down from generations past, no matter how out-of-date it is.
In my point of view, Faith in God has been the bigger evil, by far.
Wings, faith in God is not an evil. There have been many great sacrifices, rescues (the one in CHile comes to mind) and wondrous things that come from a faith in God. Evil is what we do to ourselves, whether our faith is in God, or Odin, or Allah or nothing at all. To blame faith in God for the evil that men do is like blaming the internet for pornography.
As for BLACK DEATH: Sean Bean! I'm in! Where do I find this movie!
M.D. - I don't think it is evil, but from Cal's comparison of the two (faith or no), I stand by thinking no faith is less evil.
And sorry, the rescue in Chile came from determination and hard work, not faith in any god.
This sort of sounds like the old Michael Caine movie "The Last Valley" (1970) where Caine's group of mercenaries find a valley that is untouched by war and plague.
Sounds awesome to me! Sean Bean's a great actor, too.
The point I was trying to make is that both are shown to be evil in this movie. The godly ones commit horrific acts equal to the non-godly ones. I guess I didn' make that as clear as I should have.
You know that I am on the side of the non-believers because of the evil that has been done in the name of God throughout human history.
It's easy to justify evil when you have the excuse of "God told me to do it." I agree with you Wings and M.D. that when one doesn't have the crutch of faith to lead them to commit horrible acts, one tends to view all situations with a clearer eyes.
Religion tends to bring out the worst in people.
This is just the kind of discussion that the movie elicits. There are no heroes. It really is worth seeing.
I can't agree that no religion is better as far as evil acts go. The Soviet Union was atheistic and yet Stalin's atrocities rank right up there with any religion based organization. Cal makes the point that it doesn't matter whether one is godly or not. What justification you use for evil does not matter.
Faith can beget evil but it can also beget hard work and determination.
I think some concensus has been reached. Religion sucks and people in general suck. No wonder the aliens don't want to visit us full time.
Anything with Sean in it is pure win, IMO. Obviously, I am not keeping up with his career closely enough, because I wasn't even aware of this movie. I'll have to get me a copy pronto. Thanks for the heads up!
Have you watched his 'Sharpe' movies where he plays a soldier in the British army fighting the French armies of Napoleon all over Europe. Those are great films if you like Sean. He is at his ass kicking best.
Oh, I am all to familiar with Sharpe - my dad & brothers are HUGE Sharpe fans & I have seen some of the movies for sure. He def. is an ass-kicker, and a nice-looking one at that, too.
Nothing better than the 'chosen men'. I have great memories of sharing those 'Sharpe' movies with my Dad also.
Post a Comment