Well I hate to say this but there was no way that a product called SOYLENT would ever succeed. For some reason that name should never be associated with nutrition if you get my point.
"The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) recently informed us that our products do not meet a select few of the CFIA requirements for a 'meal replacement,'" the post reads. "Although we feel strongly that these requirements do not reflect the current understanding of human nutritional needs, we respect the CFIA's regulations and will fully comply with any regulatory action they deem appropriate."
%20Collage.jpg)
1 comment:
I had the same thought about the name. WTF were they thinking?
Post a Comment